BC4-1810 Homework, Pavel Mazanik

[Pavel Mazanik]

@theluthier 

Is this for the pumpkin competition btw?

Yes, but the lighting/shading setup will be completely different for competition. And the model itself is incomplete.

And if this is Eevee, which I think is a safe bet

Nah, this time it’s all Cycles. But I’ll try to recreate this with Eevee today 😉 It’s impossible without baking thickness and cavity maps to get this SSS in Eevee. Maybe I’ll try it with Substance Painter after the course.

 My only note is that the source feels more like a material study more than a model showcase

Agree.

[Pavel Mazanik]

@swikni @gradyp @silentheart00 

Thank you 🙂

[Pavel Mazanik]

Working like 25/8 this week but still not sure if I’ll make it all by the deadline. EEVEE going to afterclass for sure. The idea of modeling every single asset by myself was a bad idea 😀

WIP, Cycles

[smurfmier1985]

@nekronavt Does look nice though 😊 Especially the monkey 😆

[Pavel Mazanik]

@smurfmier1985 thanks 🙂 This is the place where I spend most of the time with blender 😀

@theluthier Sadly, I definitely won’t make my homework by the deadline this week. I’m sorry but have an excuse. Birthday stuff 🙂/🙁

[Jere Haapaharju]

@nekronavt Is this EEVEE? Looks so much like cycles that I’m confused. If it is then it’s pretty darn good.

[Pavel Mazanik]

@swikni 

🙂 Eevee will be later, after class. I took more pie than I could eat this week with modeling the whole scene and assets from a scratch and failed with time management.

[Jere Haapaharju]

@nekronavt Oh right. Need to learn to read lol. Well cycles or eevee the wip is look good already.

[Kent Trammell]

…modeling every single asset by myself was a bad idea

Lol well I respect the effort! But yes that definitely turns into a tremendous amount of work for a week 😅

[Pavel Mazanik]

Week #4 Homework Submission (Part 1)   

I can’t believe it but I did it. And even in both engines. I still think Eevee can’t do archviz as good as Cycles, but well. I rendered cycles with 2500 samples on render farm and while it was rendering I managed to set up Eevee and render it. 30 minutes on render farm with powerful hardware (probably 2-3 hours on my machine) with Cycles vs minute with Eevee and result is pretty nice for certain purposes.

[silentheart00]

@nekronavt Phew!  You made it!  I can see some of the differences between Cycles and Eevee, but both look pretty good.  Good work.

[smurfmier1985]

@nekronavt Nice job!! 😃 That Eevee one looks much closer to the Cycles one than I expected. Considering Eevee is just a baby and will be developed much further the coming years I think it will only get better 😬

[Pavel Mazanik]

@smurfmier1985 @silentheart00 thank you 🙂 This scene cost me two sleepless nights, I hope it worth it. 

Aaaand now I just sitting here on my kitchen and rolling my kitchen scene in Eevee. It really feels strange, you guys should try it someday.

Bonus render. With some easter egg (it was on previous renders too)

[Zsolt Cseh]

I can’t believe it but I did it. And even in both engines. I still think Eevee can’t do archviz as good as Cycles, but well. I rendered cycles with 2500 samples on render farm and while it was rendering I managed to set up Eevee and render it. 30 minutes on render farm with powerful hardware (probably 2-3 hours on my machine) with Cycles vs minute with Eevee and result is pretty nice for certain purposes.

@nekronavt That is awesome Pavel, thank you for this test it is so valuable to see and I am happy that Eevee is so much more efficient with almost identical result. 

It is absolutely super to know, so 2.8 going to come with all of its great potentials very soon

[Pavel Mazanik]

@csehz thank you, man. I’m really glad, that this is useful.

Week #4 Homework Submission (Part 2)    

Sorry for being so late.

Goal artwork by Daniel Johnsson

I’m constantly not happy with my light match results… Probably exhausted a bit.

[Author]

Posts