Is there a rule when six-poles are acceptable/unavoidable? (Modeling Piero’s claws)

Forum Archive Is there a rule when six-poles are acceptable/unavoidable? (Modeling Piero’s claws)

Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #12734
    Ingmar Franz
    Participant

      @theluthier, you’re creating a six-pole on Piero’s left claw (right side view). When are these six-poles acceptable or even necessary?

      #60341
      Ingmar Franz
      Participant

        @theluthier Okay, I’ve heard you saying within the first minute of your next lesson that you want to fix this six-pole. But I would like to hear your answer to my question independently of modeling Piero.

        #60342
        Kent Trammell
        Participant

          I wouldn’t say there’s any firm *rules* about 5+ poles and where they can or cannot be located in a mesh topology. Generally you want to avoid them in highly-deforming areas like a joint (elbow, shoulder, ankle etc). But the higher density the mesh the less consequential 5+ poles becomes.

          In the case of Piero’s body, the topology is actually much less important since it’s completely covered in feathers. But I try to keep it best practices regardless. Practically it means that I can accept a pole or triangle with less worry.

        Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
        • The topic ‘Is there a rule when six-poles are acceptable/unavoidable? (Modeling Piero’s claws)’ is closed to new replies.