Hey Tim. Wouldn’t it be more accurate to treat this scale as surface roughness?

This topic has 1 reply, 2 voices, and was last updated 10 years, 9 months ago by Tim Von Rueden.

Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)

Author

Posts
December 11, 2015 at 10:19 am #6206
lhama
Participant
Hey Tim. Wouldn’t it be more accurate to treat this scale as surface roughness?
December 14, 2015 at 1:34 pm #25039
Tim Von Rueden
Participant
We’ve actually been taking a critical look at how to teach materials, and in January we are re-structuring it a bit since I agree it shouldn’t be based on Absorb – Reflect.
Author

Posts

Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)

The topic ‘Hey Tim. Wouldn’t it be more accurate to treat this scale as surface roughness?’ is closed to new replies.