Reply To: Quaternions demystified, part one

Forum Archive Quaternions demystified, part one Reply To: Quaternions demystified, part one

#52818
Kent Trammell
Participant

    @spikeyxxx You have my attention! Because I’m one of those people that avoid quaternions for assuming their difficulty. Are you going to continue explaining these? If so I’d like to understand better why there’s 4 values in quaternions vs euler’s 3 values.