Ahh, clever. It makes sense when you show it like this.
Does this mean I can use a math add node to the index node to shift from where the tangent data is read? My logic is this, instead of reading the curve at exactly 0/6, let’s say I added .5 before the division (index node -> math node [add .5]). That would give 0.5/6, 1.5/6 etcetera. And in my mind, that would cause the read tangent data ahead of the actual curve points, resulting in horses that look a bit more inwards. And also, if a value was subtracted before the division, the horses should point outwards.
Or am I wrong? Is it only the points that can be sampled, so it is important that the index/count is exact, otherwise it won’t work at all?
I will need to experiment. Hopefully understanding what it is I see as a result :p
Thanks again, I’m very grateful for all the help. It really makes all the difference!
