Why do you use Layer Weight > Facing. instead of Layer Weight > Fresnel, or just the Fresnel itself, when trying to …

Forum Archive Why do you use Layer Weight > Facing. instead of Layer Weight > Fresnel, or just the Fresnel itself, when trying to …

Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #4641

    Why do you use Layer Weight > Facing. instead of Layer Weight > Fresnel, or just the Fresnel itself, when trying to get Fresnel effect ?

    #22899
    Kent Trammell
    Participant

      That’s a very valid question – It’s not intuitive to create a ‘fresnel’ effect with something other than the ‘fresnel’ socket lol. It’s my personal preference because Facing is set to a 0-1 range (white to black) by default as opposed to the grey-ish range of the fresnel. By using 0-1 it’s easier to know exactly what values I’m swapping in. When they’re grey, it’s not quite so clear for fine tuning.

      I sometimes use the Fresnel socket instead of Facing. I suppose if I always used ‘Fresnel’ someone would be bound to ask why not “Facing”…I guess the options are there for a reason; for preference sake.

      A benefit of the Fresnel socket is if you want to be scientifically accurate, you can simply plug in the fresnel value of a material instead of ‘guessing’ till it looks nice.

    Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
    • The topic ‘Why do you use Layer Weight > Facing. instead of Layer Weight > Fresnel, or just the Fresnel itself, when trying to …’ is closed to new replies.