“While I’m not a perfect instructor and the course is certainly cannot perfect, perhaps on your end there’s some incorrect expectations for this course….”
I’ll admit I do enter a lesson with certain expectations, with 1-2-3 steps with clear and concise explanations to boot. This lesson comes with a surprise when it’s no longer in the same pedigree, hence my harsh(?) criticism. But oh boy does that sentence invite the thought “It’s either no one’s fault or its both”-route.
Since this lesson includes methodology it easily fools the student to follow every step of the way, copying yours – and if I’m allowed to create an analogy here: Jesse Pinkman from the TV serises “Breaking Bad” delivers a line where he conveys he doesn’t know HOW to make phenylacetic acid, he just goes to the barrel with a “P” on it.
To me this lesson would make more sense without the methodology and just present the results, explain why (which you already do at a later point in the video) and correlate it to a “facial transplant”.
I don’t mean to escalate the discussion, so apologies if I come excusing my own shortcomings.
