Super-handy primer on Edge Poles

Forum Archive Super-handy primer on Edge Poles

Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #16552
    Ethan ⚡️
    Participant

      The bit at 6:53 is a great example of how Blender’s edge-loop selection treats poles. And I found this article to be a handy reference about edge poles in general:

      https://topologyguides.com/manipulating-edge-poles

      #79958
      Martin Bergwerf
      Participant

        I don’t want to be too harsh on the well-meaning author of said blog post, but:

        Although there are a few useful tips in that article, there are also some questionable terms (Edge Poles, N-Poles, E-Poles) and statements (about 3-sided poles: “This kind of poles is far less common…(than 5-sided poles), And : “..,poles are inevitable and required for proper topology.”)

        The Default Cube consists of only 3-sided poles and:

        if a manifold Object has one hole for instance, it can be made without any poles. Like in these two examples:

        OneHole.png

        #79959
        Omar Domenech
        Participant

          Am I the only one that thought of Santa when reading N-Pole? Which begs the question, who’s in the E-Pole? Hearing you say that about how Blender treats poles, it sounds to me like other programs treat them differently, which I didn’t know. I thought that no mater the software, when you reached a pole the selection just stopped. 

          #79960
          Ethan ⚡️
          Participant

            Good catch, Martin — this thread contains a few more hints as to what the author might be referring to with those terms, but for the most part, they do seem to be… non-standard. I’m with Omar on leaving the N-Poles to Santa (and E-Poles to his elves, obviously 😆)

          Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
          • The topic ‘Super-handy primer on Edge Poles’ is closed to new replies.